Meta-analysis of experiments with matched groups or repeated measures designs. Journal of Consulting Psychology, 24, 349–354.ĭunlap, W. A new scale of social desirability independent of psychopathology. Journal of Studies on Alcohol, 51, 42–48.Ĭrowne, D. A comparison of methods for assessing sociopathy in male and female alcoholics. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 23, 121–143.Ĭooney, N. Offender classification: Two decades of progress. Medical Decision Making, 11, 102–106.Ĭivil Commitment of SexuallyViolent Predators Act, Texas Health & Safety Code Ann. Signal detectability: The use of ROC curves and their analyses. Spielberger (Eds.) Advances in personality assessment ( Vol. Development of an MMPI-2 scale to assess the presentation of self in a superlative manner: The S Scale. Law and Human Behavior, 17, 157–166.īutcher, J. Detection of deception in law enforcement applicants. Psychological Assessment, 4, 340–345.īorum, R., & Stock, H. MMPI-2 random responding indices: Validation using a self-report methodology. R., Wetter, M., Baer, R., Larsen, L., Clark, C., & Monroe, K. Psychological Assessment, 7, 419–423.īerry, D. Sensitivity of the MMPI-2 validity scales to underreporting of symptoms. Clinical Psychology Review, 12, 509–526.īaer, R. Detection of underreporting of psychopathology on the MMPI: A meta-analysis. Psychological Assessment, 9, 406–413.īaer, R. Effectiveness of the MMPI-2 validity indicators in the detection of defensive responding in clinical and nonclinical samples. Journal of General Psychology, 60, 17–28.īagby, R. The psychopathic personality: A content analysis of the concept. The clinical and forensic implications of these findings are discussed.Īlbert, R. 73), a considerable number of misclassifications occurred. Receiver Operating Characteristic analyses indicated that, although the Unlikely Virtues scale significantly differentiated between “fake good” and honest protocols (area under the curve =. In the “fake good” condition, participants were able to appear significantly less psychopathic, with those who obtained higher scores in the standard instruction condition showing the largest decreases in their PPI scores. In this study a repeated measures analogue design was employed in which 186 respondents completed the PPI both under standard conditions and with specific instructions to create a favorable impression of themselves. Although the PPI contains a validity scale (Unlikely Virtues) designed to identify response biases such as “faking good,” its utility has not yet been assessed. A current limitation of the PPI is that no data exist regarding the impact of response sets such as positive impression management. Andrews, 1996) is a self-report test that has shown considerable promise as a screening measure for psychopathy. The Psychopathic Personality Inventory (PPI S.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |